In the latest of a series of ongoing related cases, the renowned UK street artist Banksy has recently lost another case regarding his famous “monkey” images.
One of his most iconic ranges, his series of monkey paintings typically depict a series of apes with some form of social commentary wrapped around their necks. First commissioned by a club in Brighton in 2002, these range of images have gone on to form the basis of numerous other of the artist’s most successful pieces, with some selling for millions of dollars at auction.
Whilst such works of art are typically protected by copyright, Banksy has been famously dismissive of intellectual property rights in the past and, in this instance, it is alleged he instead tried to trade mark the painting as a backdoor route to stopping third parties from printing the images on various merchandise. The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) has recently ruled against Banksy and stated that the evidence he provided in support of his case was allegedly manufactured solely for the current proceedings and not intended to have any real legal basis.
This case goes to show that both copyright and trade marks are two of the key intellectual property rights you can have. Here at Briffa the team benefits from over 25 years’ experience in defending and bringing both copyright and trade mark claims in virtually every jurisdiction in the world. If you need any further information in this regard, please do feel free to get in touch with us via firstname.lastname@example.org.
Written by Tom Synott, Associate
To what extent can “parody” be used as a defence to copyright infringement claims?
What is the issue? What constitutes ‘parody’? The preliminary ruling from the Brussels Court of Appeal sought clarification on ‘parody’ under Article 5(3)(k)-InfoSoc Directive. This allowed EU member states to…
We’ll start with a no obligation chat where we’ll get to know you and understand your current challenges.
Book your free consultation now