Written by Thomas Staveley | October 28, 2026
There is a single, well-established test that has governed breach of confidence in English law for over fifty years. This is the three-limb test in Coco v A.N. Clark (Engineers) Ltd [1969] RPC 41.
The leading formulation from Coco v A.N. Clark (Engineers) Ltd [1969] RPC 41 is as follows:
Limb one: necessary quality of confidence
Megarry J in Coco v A.N. Clark (Engineers) Ltd [1969] RPC 41 was clear that there can be no breach of confidence in revealing something already common knowledge, though material assembled from public-domain sources can still acquire the necessary quality of confidentiality if something new is created through skill and ingenuity. The information must not be public knowledge, although sharing it with a limited number of people will not necessarily destroy confidentiality — that is a question of degree.
Limb two: circumstances importing an obligation
A reasonable person standing in the recipient’s shoes must have realised, upon reasonable grounds, that the information was being given in confidence. This obligation is often created by agreement, but it can also bind indirect recipients: an equitable obligation of confidence arises both where information is disclosed in breach of confidence and the recipient has notice of that, and where information is acquired without any prior breach but the recipient has notice that it is confidential — assessed objectively.
Limb three: unauthorised use to detriment
Finally, there must be unauthorised use of the confidential information without lawful excuse.
Why it matters
This test operates independently of contract. Therefore, whilst you may have an agreement in place and therefore a separate claim for breach of contract, breach of confidence is an equitable doctrine that can catch information passed between parties with no confidentiality agreement at all, provided the circumstances put a reasonable recipient on notice. For businesses, this means confidentiality protection does not depend solely on having an NDA or any wider agreement in place, but a well-drafted one still helps by making the obligation and its scope explicit rather than leaving limb two to inference.
A sample of things to come? German courts rule use of unlicensed Kraftwerk sample is lawful
The highest German civil court has delivered its judgment on a long-running copyright dispute which could have wide implications for sample use and licensing in the EU. The court has…
We’ll start with a no obligation chat where we’ll get to know you and understand your current challenges.
Contact us now