Skip to content
Briffa SolicitorsBriffa Solicitors
Briffa Solicitors
Intellectual Property Law
+44 (0)20 7288 6003info@briffa.com
  • What We Do
    • Practice Areas
      • Commercial and Corporate Law
      • Confidential Information
      • Copyright
      • Database Rights
      • Data Protection
      • Design Rights
      • Image Rights
      • IP Disputes
      • IP Contracts and Licences
      • Patents and Inventions
      • Trade Marks
    • Case Studies
    • Industry Specialisms
      • Baby and Child – Briffa Solicitors
      • Fashion Industry – Briffa Solicitors
      • Food and Drink Industry – Briffa Solicitors
      • Graphic Design and Branding Agencies
      • Health and Wellbeing – Briffa Solicitors
      • Music
      • Product Design
      • Technology
  • International
    • EU
    • Further afield
  • Team
  • Reviews
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Videos
  • Book a Meeting
Search site
FacebookLinkedinTwitter
  • What We Do
    • Practice Areas
      • Commercial and Corporate Law
      • Confidential Information
      • Copyright
      • Database Rights
      • Data Protection
      • Design Rights
      • Image Rights
      • IP Disputes
      • IP Contracts and Licences
      • Patents and Inventions
      • Trade Marks
    • Case Studies
    • Industry Specialisms
      • Baby and Child – Briffa Solicitors
      • Fashion Industry – Briffa Solicitors
      • Food and Drink Industry – Briffa Solicitors
      • Graphic Design and Branding Agencies
      • Health and Wellbeing – Briffa Solicitors
      • Music
      • Product Design
      • Technology
  • International
    • EU
    • Further afield
  • Team
  • Reviews
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Videos
  • Book a Meeting
Faded piano keys

James Rhodes is a classical pianist. He recorded himself playing Bach in his living room and posted the recording on YouTube as he has done on countless other occasions. YouTube immediately removed the video claiming infringement in 47 seconds of the video. Almost immediately stories were circulating on the internet headed ‘Sony Owns Bach’. As it turns out Sony does hold copyright in a number of Bach recordings, a collection featuring Glenn Gould performances. So, the YouTube claim more accurately put was not that ‘Sony Owns Bach’ but that Sony owns a number of copyrights in recording Bach music and that portions of what James Rhodes played sounded very similar to particular parts of the performance by Bach, which are in the ownership of Sony. Far less sensational but definitely equally concerning to a copyright lawyer. The fact that James Rhodes was actually playing should have been enough to halt any sane person from filing the complaint. But that is the point of the story – no actual person was involved. It transpires the whole process was computerised with the help of algorithms within YouTube’s content ID system.  A crawling bot matched the James Rhodes performance with the works in which it held copyright and wham bam it found 47 seconds of what it identified as copying and automatically deleted the section from the recording. To complete its work the system them sent Mr Rhodes a dispute claim notice and from them on in we all know the story.

Copyright law is currently under review and proposals on the table for vote at the European Parliament have reportedly triggered the fiercest lobbing the EU has ever seen in the world of intellectual property. There are two provisions of the current proposals that are making all the waves one of which is pertinent here. It is a provision that would force platforms such as YouTube to compensate owners for use of content on its site and also police the use of content by making the platform liable for unlawful use of copyrighted material.

There is a vote on these provisions in the European Parliament this week and it could go either way. Meanwhile the further development of the technology to track infringement looks urgent. Watch this space for updates.

Share this post

Post navigation

PreviousPrevious post:Oh Maggie I couldn’t have cried any moreNextNext post:BriffaWay – What has the EU ever done for IP? Chapter 1

Related posts

A B C Book
C is for Copyright Infringement
5th December 2019
Bake off
The Great British Bake Off Parody Conundrum
13th November 2019
Blockchain
Audius – good or bad for the music industry?
18th October 2019
Dark horse
Katy Perry fanning the Flame
11th October 2019
furniture
A step forward for copyright protection
9th October 2019
Spotify
Will the real valid licence please stand up? Eight Mile Style go the extra mile against Spotify
25th September 2019
Main service pages
  • Baby and Child
  • Beyond the EU
  • Briffa’s Complaints Handling Procedure
  • Case Studies
  • Case Study – Creative thinking on trade mark matters
  • Case Study – Design Infringement
  • Case Study – Employee Breach of Restrictive Covenants
  • Case Study – Games Development – Publishing Deal
  • Data Protection
  • Fashion Industry
  • Food and Drink Industry
  • Graphic Design and Branding Agencies
  • Health and Wellbeing
  • Music
  • Privacy Policy
  • Product Design
  • Reviews
  • Technology
  • Video
  • Brand Clearance and Protection
  • Commercial and Corporate Law
  • Confidential Information
  • Copyright
  • Database Rights
  • Design Rights
  • Industry Specialisms
  • IP Contracts and Licences
  • IP Disputes
  • Patents and Inventions
  • Practice Areas
  • Trade Marks
  • Brexit and your Intellectual Property
  • Cease and Desist Letters
  • Ceyda Sam- Solicitor
  • Hasnath Ahmed – Solicitor
  • Image Rights
  • Joshuanne Amachie
  • Noyemie Sahakian – Solicitor
  • Ramsay Monime – Senior Associate
  • Samuel O’Toole
  • Tom Synott – Solicitor
  • Copyright Infringement by An Employee
  • IP Solicitors for Games Developers
  • DesignProtect Insurance
  • Furniture Design IP Dispute Case Study
  • IP for Fashion Designers
  • E-commerce
  • Entertainment and Media Law
  • Intellectual Property Audits
  • International Intellectual Property Rights
Categories
Subscribe
CONTACT US
  • Main Office
    Business Design Centre, 52 Upper Street, Islington, London N1 0QH, UK
  • Telephone : (44) 020 7288 6003, Email : info@briffa.com
  • Office in Europe
    Grand Central, 157 Archbishop Street, Valletta, VLT 1440, Malta
  • Email : info@briffa.com
Recent Posts
  • C is for Copyright Infringement 5th December 2019
  • Brand protection… the big questions answered 5th December 2019
  • New ammunition against trade mark squatters in China? 29th November 2019
Briffa tweets
  • Katy Perry Fights Back Against $2.8 Million Copyright Infringement Ruling https://t.co/nabm2YU0Cy13 hours ago
  • Danish court rules artist's work cannot be cut up to make watches https://t.co/zoqGnQtYvU3 days ago
  • Jay-Z is in the news again – this time for issuing proceedings against children’s author Jessica Chiha, who wrote “… https://t.co/IFL0CDHq604 days ago
Briffa is the trading name of Briffa Legal Limited: a company registered in England and Wales (No. 07655999) and authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (No. 561243). © Briffa