Written by Laura Gathercole | September 4, 2025
AI tools have increasingly become a staple part of our lives, whether for writing emails, organising our schedules or creating works of art. Businesses and creators are relying more heavily on machines to do what used to require humans. But, under UK copyright law, authorship matters, and machines aren’t people. So, who owns the copyright in content that has been created by artificial intelligence?
Definition of authorship
According to UK copyright law, copyright protects original works that involve a degree of skill, labour and judgment. Crucially, the law defines an author as the person who creates the work, which presents an immediate issue for AI generated content. If a machine composed a song, painted a picture, or wrote poem, who is the author?
Can a machine be an author?
Under current UK law, no. A machine or system cannot own copyright, as it is not a legal person. However, the UK does recognise the possibility of ‘computer generated works’ and is unique in how it treats them.
For works generated by a computer in circumstances where there is no human author, the ‘author’ will be “the person by whom the arrangements necessary for the creation of the work are undertaken.” In other words, the individual operating the AI to produce the content may be treated as its author (although, this area remains untested by the UK courts).
This differs from U.S. copyright law, where no copyright is granted to AI generated works without clear human authorship. UK law, for now, is therefore more permissive.
So, who owns AI generated content?
Let’s break it down:
| If you use AI as a tool | If you input prompts, choose the parameters and make edits to the final product, you are likely to be the author of the work, assuming that your input demonstrates some creative control. |
| If you let the AI run autonomously | If you feed a vague prompt into a generative system and publish the raw output with no meaningful human input, the content may be considered non-human authored. While UK law allows for the person who made the necessary arrangements to be the author, this is less robust as it is harder (or potentially not possible) to enforce internationally. |
| If you use a third-party AI platform | If you use an AI service, you would need to check the platform’s terms and conditions. For example, ChatGPT generally allows users to own the output generated by their prompts, subject to its terms. |
How do you protect your business when using AI?
If your business is using AI generated content, for example, for marketing, products, internal tools or media, then here are some recommendations of what to do.
Common mistakes to avoid
Final thoughts
We are entering (or have already entered) an era where machines can create and output material faster than humans, and the law is still catching up. UK law provides some flexibility around computer generated works; authorship and originality remain key to copyright protection. If you are using AI to create content, understanding your legal position now could prevent disputes later.
Contact us to learn how we can help you protect and use AI generated content with confidence.
Written by Laura Gathercole – Solicitor
We’ll start with a no obligation chat where we’ll get to know you and understand your current challenges.
Contact us now