In the olden days parties campaigned by knocking on doors, holding rallies and sending endless bits of paper to voters. But, what this latest election has shown us, apart from the fact that people seem pretty keen to get Brexit done, is that social media is the new median to reach voters. Whilst this may seem fine in theory, and certainly friendlier to the planet, it does have some problems. Most notably the ease by which media content can now be manipulated and, in this “post truth” world, the propensity for parties to do this.
There have many stories of the last few months about social media campaigns featuring inaccuracies however what’s relatively new, is the use of intellectual property laws, to stop them. The most widely reported of which is the Conservative election ad deleted by Facebook after a complaint from the BBC on the grounds of copyright infringement.
Copyright laws give the owners of literary, artistic and photographic works (amongst others) the right to control the ways in which their works are used, copied or shared. This normally means that if a work is used without permission the use will constitute a copyright infringement.
However, a copyright infringement claim is not always that straightforward and it carries with it a number of “fair dealing defences”. Essentially these are ways to avoid a claim by arguing that you had a good reason to use the content without a licence. The most relevant of these, in the world of political campaigns, are as follows:
Criticism & review
This allows the use of short extracts or quotations for the purposes of critique and review.
If fair dealing is for the purpose of criticism, that criticism can be strongly expressed and unbalanced, without forfeiting the fair dealing defence (although if it is defamatory then that is a separate cause of action).
Like the criticism and review exception, the exception for quotation applies to all types of copyright work including film, broadcasts, sound recordings, and photographs as well as traditional text quotation.
The taking of the entirety of a work may be a quotation if the requirement that the extent of use is “no more than is required”, is satisfied.
Reporting current events
Often referred to as the news reporting defence, fair dealing with any category of work, other than a photograph, for the purpose of reporting current events does not infringe copyright in a work provided it is accompanied by a sufficient acknowledgment (acknowledgement is also needed for criticism & review and quotation).
“Current events” in this context includes events of current interest to the public even if they occurred some time in the past.
Caricature, parody or pastiche
This is the big one when it comes to online campaigns. Essentially the law permits an exception in the case of use for the purpose of caricature, parody or pastiche providing that use is fair dealing.
The courts have decided:
Of course great care needs to be taken when relying on any of these defence as many carry specific conditions before they can be used. Fortunately however, Briffa offers specialist and expert advice on all aspects of copyright law. So, if you’re a political party planning your next campaign, or a content owner hoping to avoid a feature in the next Brexit party ad, why not email email@example.com to discuss your options.
Written by Will Miles, Solicitor
To what extent can “parody” be used as a defence to copyright infringement claims?
What is the issue? What constitutes ‘parody’? The preliminary ruling from the Brussels Court of Appeal sought clarification on ‘parody’ under Article 5(3)(k)-InfoSoc Directive. This allowed EU member states to…
We’ll start with a no obligation chat where we’ll get to know you and understand your current challenges.
Book your free consultation now