Briffa

Business Design Centre
52 Upper Street
Islington
London
N1 0QH

t: (44) 020 7288 6003
F: (44) 020 7288 6004
e: info@briffa.com

Creative Lawyers for Creative Business

May 2007

When Family Feasts Turn Sour

Kernel Sanders may have spoiled Christmas for one country pub in North Yorkshire. The fried chicken giant threatened to sue the Tan Hill Pub for trade mark infringement after the pub advertised its Christmas dinner as a “Family Feast”, a registered trade mark of KFC. The family feast is a cornerstone of KFC’s brand as the fast food giant competes in this ever increasing saturated market. According to KFC’s website the family feast includes the mouth watering combination of 10 pieces of freshly prepared Original Recipe chicken, Large Chips, Large Coleslaw, Large Potato & Gravy, and 1.25L Drink to meet all the family’s needs. Meanwhile the pub’s landlady Tracy Daly went for the more traditional combination of Guinness and stilton pate, roast turkey and Christmas pudding. Despite this gastronomic diversity the fast food giant felt the need to establish its ownership credentials by sending threatening letters.
KFC have since dropped the case after it received negative press coverage but defended its actions stating that “KFC has to protect its trademarks against those who seek to trade off its brand. KFC has spoken to Mrs. Daly at the Tan Hill Inn and confirmed that it will not take this case any further", further adding, "It’s an unusual situation that has been blown out of all proportion".

Briffa’s Opinion
The press unsurprisingly latched onto this incident as it highlighted the classic David and Goliath scenarios that intellectual property law sometimes throws up. However KFC were faced with a difficult a situation. Having managed to register an incredibly generic term they are now in a position where they are going to have to fight to keep it. While use of this mark by one obscure pub in Yorkshire will probably not dilute the mark’s reputation this action sends out a warning to other eating establishments so that this remains an “unusual situation”. If larger pub chains started running a similar campaign without KFC challenging them, it could well impact the mark’s registrability. The dilemma for a company like KFC is that in doing so it may well damage the company’s reputation if it is seen as brand bully. It will be a question of judgement whether such tactics are worth it.

Want to know more?

BRIFFA
Intellectual Property and Information Technology Lawyers

© Briffa